سبک رهبری توزیع شده و اثربخشی سازمانی مدارس

نویسندگان
فخرالسادات نصیری ولیک بنی
الهه قنبری
دانشگاه بوعلی سینا
10.18869/acadpub.erj.2.31.110
چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر مطالعه رابطه بین سبک رهبری توزیع­شده با اثربخشی سازمانی مدارس متوسطه شهر همدان است که از روش همبستگی استفاده شد. جامعه آماری کلیه دبیران مدارس متوسطه دولتی شهر همدان در سال 1393 است. با استفاده از نمونه­گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای و بر اساس جدول کرجسی و مورگان تعداد 335 نفر­ انتخاب شدند. برای گردآوری داده­های مورد نیاز از پرسشنامه‌های استاندارد سبک رهبری توزیع­شده و اثربخشی سازمانی مدارس استفاده شد. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده­ها، از روش­های آمار توصیفی و آمار استنباطی همچون کالموگروف- اسمیرونوف، آزمون t یک‌طرفه، همبستگی پیرسون، تحلیل واریانس یک‌طرفه و تحلیل رگرسیون گام به گام استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که وضعیت رهبری توزیع­شده و اثربخشی سازمانی مدارس متوسطه بالاتر از حد متوسط (3) است. بین سبک رهبری توزیعی مدیران، با اثربخشی سازمانی رابطه مثبت و معنادار وجود دارد. همچنین، مؤلفه توسعه حرفه­ای بیشترین تأثیر را برای اثربخشی سازمانی دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
مدارس متوسطه شهر همدان
سبک رهبری توزیع شده
اثربخشی سازمانی

عنوان مقاله English

Analysis of the Relationship between Distributed Leadership Style and Organizational Effectiveness of High Schools in Hamadan

نویسندگان English

Fakhrossadat Nasiri Valik Bani
Elahe Ghanbari
چکیده English

The main objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between Distributed Leadership and Organizational Effectiveness of high schools in Hamadan city. The research method was descriptive-correlation. The statistical population included all high school teachers of Hamadan in the academic year of 2015. Based on classical random sampling, using Krejcie and Morgan chart, 335 teachers were chosen. Two questionnaires were used for data collection, Distributed Leadership Questionnaire and Organizational Effectiveness Questionnaire. The reliability of the questionnaires was calculated by Cronbach’s Alph Coefficient which was acceptable (%91 and %99). Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, and inferential statistics such as Pearson correlation coefficient, t-test for the independent groups, ANOVA and stepwise regression. Regression Analysis indicated the following results. The status quo Distributed Leadership Style and Organizational Effectiveness were above average. There were significant positive correlations between Distributed Leadership Style and Organizational Effectiveness advantage. Moreover, professional development component had greatest impact on Organizational Effectiveness.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Distributed Leadership
High Schools Of Hamadan
Organizational effectiveness
Abari, A. O., & Oyetola, I. O. (2012). Organizational identity, schools effectiveness and the system theory. Educational Research Journal. 2, 104-110.

Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P. A., & Harvey, J. A. (2003). Distributed Leadership: A review of literature. National College for School Leadership.

Botha, R. J. (2010). School effectiveness: conceptualizing divergent assessment approaches. South African Journal of Education EASA, 30, 605-620.

Chi, K. S., & Sofian, S, (2011). The impact of human capital and total quality management on corporate performance. Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research. 3, 1091-1100.

Daft, R. L., Murphy. J., & Willmott, H. (2010). Organization theory design. Andover: South-Western Cengage Learning.

Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.

Engel-Silva, M. (2009). The role of distributed leadership in quality educational organizations. Californian: University of California. Unpublished master’s thesis.

Etcher, J. P. (1997). Post‐Heroic Leadership: managing the virtual organization. Performance Improvement, 36, 5-10.

Goulding, A., & Walton, J. G. (2014). Distributed leadership and library service innovation. Advances in Librarianship, 38, 37-81.

Grenda, J. P. (2006). Leadership, Distributed. In F.W. English, Encyclopedia of Educational Leadership and Administration. London: Rolf A.

Janke. Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership: how has the model evolved and what have we learned? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (2003). Understanding the contribution of leadership to school improvement in: M. Wallace and L. Paulson (Ed.). Learning to Read Critically in Educational Leadership and Management. London: Sage.

Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32,11–24.

Harris, A. (2009). Distributed leadership different perspectives. University of London: Institute of Education.

Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 172-188.

Harrison, B. L. (2008). The perceptions of teachers and school administrators of school effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Mississippi.

Hatcher, R. (2005). The distribution of leadership and power in schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26, 253-267.

Henderson, J. D. (2011). Instructional and organizational effectiveness in selected preps-identified value added and preps-identified value subtracted elementary schools in Mississippi. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Mississippi.

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2008). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.

Kupers, W., & Weibler, J. (2006). How emotional is transformational really? Some suggestions for a necessary extension. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27, 68-38.

Lashvay, L. (2003). Distributed leadership. Clearinghouse on educational policy management, 1-7. Retrieved January 26, 2006 from Research Roundup.

Mc Beath, J. (2005). Leadership as distributed: a matter of practice. School Leadership and Management, 25, 349-366.

Mortimore, P. (2000). Globalization, effectiveness and improvement. Paper read at the 13th annual meeting of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Hong Kong.

Palmer, B., Walls, M., & Stough, C. (2002). Emotional intelligence and effective leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organization Development, 22, 5-10.

Rivers, S. D. (2010). Leadership as a distributed phenomenon: a study of shared roles and grade student achievement. ProQuest Publisher. Dissertation publishing.

Spilane, J., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. (2004). Toward a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Curriculum Studies. 36, 3-34.

Sun, H., Creemers, B. P.M., & De Jong, R. (2007). Contextual factors and effective school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18. 93-122.