Explaining the foundations of kant’s philosophical view of rational education and its functional requirements

Authors
Ministry of Science, Research and Technology
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to explain the philosophical foundations of Kant’s rational education and its requirements in terms of goals, principles and methods of education and rational education. Kant has outstanding philosophical reflections in the field of wisdom, especially practical wisdom, which leads to the general rules of the universe, and he is one of the philosophers whose views on enlightenment are similar to the Copernican revolution. He has arational approach to education. This research has been done with the analytical method of conceptual in terpretation and direct reference to first hand and translated sources, related texts, articles and Journals. Therefore first,the conceptual analysis of the texts of kant’s thoughts with the context of existence, knowledge, human, value was done, and then by using the concepts and categories related to them, finally,a list of goals, principles and methods was deduced based on rational foundations witch are based on the ontology of experimental,sensory and intellectual educational methods and based on the knowledge of the methods and based on the knowledge of the methods to answer the questions of what can I know? What should I know? What hope can I have? what is man? The process of analysis takes place and in the answer to the fourth question, human nature is linked to its social aspects such as education, especially one of the foundations of values of moral duty which is the source of reason,and on the one hand, due to his pragmatic point of view,the components are tried fundamentals of kant’s educational methods such as previous knowledge, presuppositions,analogy, deletion, addition, interpretation in the shade of anthropology should be examined, and finally, the model of proposed models for the perception of cognitive and educational construction has been discussed.
Keywords

Abulmali. kh. (1390). Qualitative researches from theory to practice. publisher of Alm. (Persian)
Bagheri, kh. (1395).An in troduction to the philosophy of education in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Katiba scientific and cultural publishing company. (Persian)
Bayer.T. (2010). The idea of human dignity, problems and contradictions (Awani. sh,Trans). Philosophy lessons.Dr karim Mojtahedi’s celebratory letter: 117
Guyer.P & wood.A. (2022).critique of pure Reason.CALVELLO BOOKS. Cambridge:publisher university press: 238-241
Kant.I. (2022).Anthropology from a practical point of view(Folady. A,Trans).contemporary view book:18 Kant.I. (2021).criticism of pure reason(Nazari. B, trans). phoenix publisher
Kant.I. (2015).criticism of pure reason (Nazari. B, Trans) second edition by Mohammad Mahdi Ardabili. Tehran; phoenix:51
Kant. I. (2021). Measuring the pure wisdom (Adibsoltani.M.sh, Trans) second edition.Mind Quarterly. (4):10
Kant.I. (2011).The measure of pure wisdom (Adibsoltani.M.sh,Trans).2nd edition. Tehran Amirkabir.4:9-21.135-145. editorA50-B74
Kant.I. (1993). Critique of pure resone (kempsmith mcmilian.N,Trans).Published by press SYNDICATE of the university of CAMBRIDGEThe Pitt Building:775-770
Kant.I. (1929).critique of pure Reason(Nor manKemp smith.L,Trans).London: Macmillan 8co
Kant.I. (1781).critique of pure Reason.German: 856
Karl.J. (2011).kant (Naghibzadeh.A, Trans).Tahuri library publisher
Wilson Holly. L. (1957).Kant’s pragmatic an thropology: its origin, meaning, and critical significance. State university of New York press: xiv-165
Abdulabadi.A. (1389). Alook at the place of transcendental concept in kant’s theoretical philosophy.Tabriz university, Faculty of literature.53(216):82-88. (Persian)
Babapour.so & shahnazari. J. (1392).Acomparative study of the compatibility of mind and object in the epistemology of mullasadra and kant. specialized quarterly magazine of philosophy and speech. (8):134-110. (Persian)
Beheshti. s & Nikoyi. R. (1388). An analysis and criticism of kant’s educational philosophy with an emphasis on moral theory.Journal of Educational sciences and psychology, chmran university of Ahvaz.15(3):27-50. (Persian)
Ghafari. H. (1392).Acritical and adaptive review of kant’s theoretical philosophy. Iranian Journal’s Hakmat:35-307. (Persian)
Lenczewska.o. (2021).Kant on the Normative features of pluralistic thinking. Cambridge university press. Kant year book.13(1): 107-128
Mahini.F & yousefi.A & Golestani. S.H & keshtiAra.N. (1395).The implications of moral education of semantics (should) from the perspective of kant and legal theologians. Journal of research in curriculum planning. 2(21):93-105. (Persian)
Mahrozadeh.T. (1392). Kant’s educational philosophy and its foundations.Iranian wisdom and philosophy Research Institute:166-198. (Persian)
Mohammad Rezaei.M &MohammadRezaei.M. (1394).Examining Kant’s duty-oriented ethical philosophy in the organization and comparing it with the organization’s global ethical charter.Journal of research Organizational culture management.13(2):537-557. (Persian)
Rohani Rawori.M &Talibzadeh.H. (1390).Anthrophology in kant’s thought. Isfahan Faculty of literature and Human sciences Metaphysical Research Journal. 3(11,12):13-88. (Persian)
Saeedi.z. (1398). The index and measure of rationality in kant’s thought. The second international peace research conference:13-2. (Persian)
Skowronski.k & Samipihls. T &eds. (2019).pragmatism, kant and Kantianism in the twenty-first century. Helsinki, finland: 60-75
Turkashwand. N &Ghaffari.kh & Faghihi.A &Natyghi.F. (1397). A comparative study of the goals and principles of rational educatin in the thought of Allameh Jafari and kant. Journal Islam and educational.Isc reserch. (Persian)
Kant.I. (1798).Anthropology froma pragmatic point of view.online publication date.18
Malihi. Q. (2012).Immanuel kant’s educational ideas.Islamic Azad university khorasgan,Branch Isfahan.Iran. Available from: http://ghm 49.blogfa.com. (Persian)
Paton,H.J. (1935).The categorical Imperative. London. Hutchinson university library
Sticker.M &Bakhurst. D. (2021). Kant on education and improvement; thems and problems. Journal of philosophy of Education.55: 909-920. Available from:http://doi.org/10.111/1464-9752.12631