Analyzing the effective requirements and prerequisites of English language teacher training and improvement courses: a qualitative study

Authors
1 Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University
2 Bandar Lenge Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract
The aim of the current research was to analyze the requirements and prerequisites of the effective training and improvement courses for English teachers. The method of the current research was a qualitative content analysis type. The statistical population of the research included all English language teachers in English language teaching centers in Shiraz, based on theoretical (purposive) sampling, interviews were conducted with 26 teachers and data were extracted from the interviews. In order to analyze the data obtained from the interview, Granheim and Lundman's qualitative method was used. The results of data analysis have been presented through three stages of open, central and selective coding. The general results of the research showed lesson design and presentation, classroom management, student evaluation, interaction, teaching strategies, teachers' characteristics, activity management, and technique. Dealing with errors as found to be among the key requirements in the training and improvement of English language teachers. Also, the goals of the course, the characteristics of the course, the experiences of the teachers, the overall evaluation of the course, specialization and supplementary activities are considered prerequisites and influencing factors on the training and improvement courses of English language teachers, which can be included in the program. Planning these courses as best as possible will be of great help. Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that paying attention to the necessary requirements and prerequisites examined in this research has a key and pivotal role in improving the training courses and improvement of English teachers. Therefore, not paying attention to these requirements in the design of training courses and improvement of instructors will result in low quality of learning and training of learners.

Keywords

Al-Seghayer, K. (2017). The central characteristics of successful ESL/EFL teachers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(5), 881-890.
Aykaç, N., & Yildirim, K. (2017). Evaluation of Classroom Teachers' Opinions about In-Service Training (The Case of Mugla). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(1), 1121-1130.
Ayvaz-Tuncel, Z., & Çobanoglu, F. (2018). In-Service Teacher Training: Problems of the Teachers as Learners. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 159-174.
Badawi, M. F. (2009). Using Blended Learning for Enhancing EFL Prospective Teachers' Pedagogical Knowledge and Performance. Online Submission.
Bayrakcı, M. (2009). In-service teacher training in Japan and Turkey: A comparative analysis of institutions and practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 2.
Baytur, B. & Razı, S. (2015). The characteristics of effective EFL teachers from the perspective of Turkish EFL learners. International Journal of Human Behavioral Science, 1(2), 1-9.
Cirocki, A., & Farrell, T. S. (2019). Professional development of secondary school EFL teachers: Voices from Indonesia. System, 85, 102111.
Garzón Artacho, E., Martínez, T. S., Ortega Martin, J. L., Marin Marin, J. A., & Gomez Garcia, G. (2020). Teacher training in lifelong learning—The importance of digital competence in the encouragement of teaching innovation. Sustainability, 12(7), 2852.
Halim, S., Wahid, R. A., & Halim, T. (2018). Classroom observation-a powerful tool for continuous professional development (Cpd). International Journal on Language, Research and Education Studies, 2(2), 162-169.
Liando, N. V. (2015). Students VS teachers perspectiveson best teacher characteristicsin EFL classrooms. TEFLIN journal, 21(2), 118-136.
Locke, L.F. (1984). Research on Teaching Teachers: Where are We Now? Journal ofTeaching Physical Education. Monograph 2.
Pfau, R. (2005). An Introduction to On-the-Job Training and Learning. In: Technical report. Available at: https://www. researchgate. net/publication .
Popova, A., Evans, D. K., Breeding, M. E., & Arancibia, V. (2022). Teacher professional development around the world: The gap between evidence and practice. The World Bank Research Observer, 37(1), 107-136.
Rubio, C. M. (2009). Efective teachers-profesional and personal skills. Ensayos: Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete, (24), 35-46.
Sadeghi, K., & Richards, J. C. (2021). Professional development among English language teachers: challenges and recommendations for practice. Heliyon, 7(9), e08053.
Sandholtz, J. H. (2002). Inservice training or professional development: Contrasting opportunities in a school/university partnership. Teaching and teacher education, 18(7), 815-830.
Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305.
Sulis, G., Mercer, S., Mairitsch, A., Babic, S., & Shin, S. (2021). Pre-service language teacher wellbeing as a complex dynamic system. System, 103, 102642.
Tajeddin, Z., & Alemi, M. (2019). Effective Language Teachers as Persons: Exploring Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers' Beliefs. TESL-EJ, 22(4), n4.
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(1), 77-100.
Ulla, M. B. (2018). In-Service Teachers' Training: The Case of University Teachers in Yangon, Myanmar. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 66-77.