The identification role of academic training on developing the entrepreneurial spirit and providing soloutions strategies for promoting among the students of Allameh TabatabaʼI University

Authors
Abstract
Entrepreneurial has been considered as an approach and also as a third mission of universities and higher education in recent years. So the present study investigated the role of education for creating spirit of entrepreneurial among the students of Allameh Tabatabai, at the end of this paper offered some strategies of solution for improving it. The method that was used in this research was mixed of (quantitative-qualitative) method. For quantitative data the researcher used a self-made questionnaire and the validity of that was confirmed by experts and the reliability of the instrument have been reported 92 %( Cronbach's alpha), and for collecting qualitative data it was used participant observation and semi structured then they combined by Triangulation method. The sampling method was cluster sampling witch was used for selecting 300 students of Allameh Tabatabai University they were enrolled in 1394-1393. Target qualitative sampling method with Theoretical saturation index was used for sampling so 15 Professors were selected. Attitudes and views of academic entrepreneurship promotion strategies were examined. All components of entrepreneurship, such as Achievement, Ambiguity tolerance, confidence, risk-taking and creativity have been reported less than mediocrity. The overall conclusion of the students’ training courses of Allameh Tabatabai don’t have an effect on the developing of the spirit of entrepreneurial which was held for them .The researchers who had an interview with experts for improving the entrepreneurial of university offered five main categories as: changes in the role of universities (acceptance of new), infrastructure, networking, promotion of academic activities and management changes.
Keywords

Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (2014). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inf Syst Res, 9 (2):204–215.

Atkinson , J., & Raynor, J. (1974). Motivation and achievement. Winston: Washington.

Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities, patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35, 518- 532.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.

Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five. Sage Publication.

Etzkowitz, H., Splund, P., & Nordman, N. (2001). Beyond Humboldt: Emergence of Academic Entrepreneurship in the U.S & Sweden. CERUM, Working paper.

Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., & Narjisse, L. (2006). Effect and counter-effect of entrepreneurship education and social context on student’s intentions. Studios de Economic Applicate, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 509 – 523.

Grote, G., & James, L. (1991). Testing behavioral consistency and coherence with the situation response measure of achievement motivation. Multivariate Behav Research, 26:655–691 doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2604_5.

Gürol, Y., & Atsan, N. (2005). Entrepreneurial Characteristics among University Students and Training in Turkey. Education and Training, Vol. 48, Issue, 1, pp. 25-38.

Hansemark, O. (2003). The effects of an entrepreneurship program on need for achievement and locus of control of reinforcement. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp.28–50.

Ho, T., & Koh, H. (1992). Differences in psychological characteristics between entrepreneurially inclined accounting graduates in Singapore. Entrep Innov Change, 1:243–254.

Kirkwood, j. (2007). Igniting the entrepreneurial spirit: is the role parents play gendered? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp.39–59.

Kliem, R. L., & Ludin, L. S. (2000). Reducing Project Risk, Hampshire. Gower: Publishing Company.

Koh, H. (1992). Differences in psychological characteristics between entrepreneurially inclined accounting graduates in Singapore. Entrep Innov Change, 250–266.

Levie, J. (1999). Entrepreneurship: my thane Reality. Science & Public Affairs, (17). pp. 24-25.

Linan, F., Rodriguez-Cohard, J., Rueda-Cantuche, C., & José, M. (2011). Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: a role for education. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 195-218.

McClelland, D. (1987). Characteristics of successful entrepreneurs. Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol. 21, pp.219–233.

Nabi, G., & Linan, F. (2011). Graduate entrepreneurship in the developing world: intentions, education and development. Education and Training, Vol. 53, No. 5, pp. 325 – 334.

Rasmussen, E., & Srheim, R. (2006). Action – based Entrepreneurship Education. Technovation, (26). pp. 185- 194.

Rol, Y., & Atson, N. (2014). Entrepreneurial characteristics amongst university students: Some insights for entrepreneurship education and training in Turkey. Education+Training, 48 (1). Pages 25-38.

Ropke, J. (2006). Knowledge Mobilization and Academic.

Rothaermel, F., Agung, S., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy o f the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16 (4), 691–791.

Sanchez, J. c. (2011). University training for entrepreneurial competencies: Its impact on intention of venture creation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 239-254.

Siegel, D., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). University commercialization of intellectual property: Policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640-660.

Utsch, A., & Rauch, A. (2011). Innovativeness and initiative as mediators between achievement orientation and venture performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9 (1). 45–62.

Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial selfefficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications of entrepreneurship education Entrepreneurship. Theory and Practice, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 387-406.