The Comparison of Educational-Learning Environment and Academic Locus of Control between Students of Tizhooshan, Nemooneh and Shahed Schools

Authors
1 Ardakan University
2 Islamic Azad University of Ardakan
Abstract
The main purpose of present study was to comparing of educational-learning environment and academic locus of control between students of Tizhooshan, Nemooneh and Shahed schools. This research was a correlation study that accomplished in a sample of 506 students who selected by randomly sampling. Data were collected by Dundee ready learning-education environment measure (DREEM) and academic locus of control scale (ALCS) and analyzed by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent t-test. The results show that the significantly difference between students of Tizhooshan and Shahed was only in students’ perception of learning (in favor of Shahed students). In the other dimensions of educational-learning environment and academic locus of control, there was no difference between schools. With regarding of the results can conclude that Tizhooshan schools cannot establish any difference in educational-learning environment and academic locus of control of students.
Keywords

Alexander, P.A. (1985).Gifted and Nongifted Students' Perceptions of Intelligence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(3), 137-143.
Anderson, G.J. (1970). Effects of Classroom Social Climate on Individual Learning. American Educational Research Journal, 7(2), 135-152.
Borich, G.D., &Tombaric, M.L., (1995). Educational Psychology. NewYork: Harper Collins Callage Publisher.
Chiu, J.P.P., & Nevius, J.R. (1990).Three Wishes of Gifted and Nongifted Adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 151(2), 133-138.
Cropper, C (1998). Is Competition an Effective Classroom Tool for the Gifted Student? Gifted Child Quarterly 21(3), 28-31.
Cross, T.L., Gust-Brey, K., Ball, P. (2002). A Psychological Autopsy of the Suicide of an Academically Gifted Student: Researchers' and Parents' Perspectives. Gifted Child Quarterly Fall, 46 (4), 247-264.
Cross, T.L. (2011).Walking the Straight and Narrow: The Role of School Punishment in the Emotional Decline of the Gifted Student. Gifted Child Today 32(2), 43-44.
Curtis, N.A., & Trice, A.D. (2013). A revision of the academic locus of control scale for college students 1. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 116, 817-829.
Fazey, D.M.A., & Fazey, J.A. (2001). The Potential for Autonomy in Learning: Perceptions of competence, motivation and locus of control in first-year undergraduate students. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 345-361.
Fincham, F., & Barling, J. (1978). Locus of Control and Generosity in Learning Disabled, Normal Achieving, and Gifted Children. Child Development, 49(2), 530-533.
Hallahan, D.P., Kaufman, J.M., & Pullen, P.C (2009). Exceptional Learners: an introduction to special education. New York: Allyn& Bacon, Pearson.
Harty, H., & Beall, D. (1984).Attitudes toward science of gifted and nongifted fifth graders. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(5), 483–488.
Kahyaoglu, M. (2013).A comparision between gifted students and non-gifted students' learning styles and their motivation styles towards science learning. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(12), 890-896.
Klein, J.D., & Keller, J.M. (1990). Influence of Student Ability, Locus of Control, and Type of Instructional Control on Performance and Confidence. Journal of Educational Research, 83(3), 140-146.
Lang, Q.C., Wong, A.F. L., & Fraser, B.J. (2005a). Teacher-Student Interaction and Gifted Students' Attitudes toward Chemistry in Laboratory Classrooms in Singapore. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40(1), 18-28.
Lang, Q.C., Wong, A.F. L., & Fraser, B.J. (2005b).Student Perceptions of Chemistry Laboratory Learning Environments, Student–Teacher Interactions and Attitudes in Secondary School Gifted Education Classes in Singapore. Research in Science Education, 35(2-3), 299-321.
Li, A.K.F. (1992).Gifted Secondary Students' Preferred Learning Style: Cooperative, Competitive, or Individualistic? Journal for the Education of the Gifted October, 16(1), 46-54.
Litster, K., & Roberts, L. (2011).The self-concepts and perceived competencies of gifted and non-gifted students: a meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11(2), 130–140.
Mendez, L.M.R. (2000). Gender Roles and Achievement-Related Choices: A Comparison of Early Adolescent Girls in Gifted and General Education Programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24(2), 149-169.
McCoach, D.B., & Siegle, D. (2003). Factors That Differentiate Underachieving Gifted Students From High-Achieving Gifted Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144-154.
Mueller, C.E. (2009). Protective Factors as Barriers to Depression in Gifted and Nongifted Adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(1), 3-14.
Pfeiffer, S.I. (2002). Identifying Gifted and Talented Students. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(1), 31-50.
Piirto, J. (1999). Talented children and adults: Their development and education (2nd Ed.). Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall/Merrill.
Preckel, F., Goetz, T., Pekrun, P., & Kleine, M. (2008). Gender Differences in Gifted and Average-Ability Students Comparing Girls' and Boys' Achievement, Self-Concept, Interest, and Motivation in Mathematics. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 146-159.
Ramsay, S.G., & Richards, H.C. (1997). Cooperative Learning Environments: Effects on Academic Attitudes of Gifted Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(4), 160-168.
Roff, S., McAleer, S., Harden, R.M., Al-Qahtani, M., Ahmed, A.U., Deza, H., Groenen, G., & Primparyon, P. (1997). Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Medical Teacher, 19(4):295-299.
Roff, S. (2005). The Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM)—a generic instrument for measuring students’ perceptions of undergraduate health professions curricula. Medical Teacher, 27(4):322-5.
Rotter, J.B. (1975). Some pro'blems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal vs. external control of reinforcement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 56-67.
Trice. A.D. (1985). An academic locus of control scale for college students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1043-1046.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Zuo, L., Avery, L.D., Little, C.A. (2002). A Curriculum Study of Gifted-Student Learning in the Language Arts. Gifted Child Quarterly Winter, (46), 30-44.
Yang, I., Lee, S., Kim, S., Lim, S. (2012).Comparison of Motivation System of Science Learning Between Gifted Students and Non-gifted Students in Elementary School. International Information Institute (Tokyo), 17, 6189-6194.
Yong, F.N. (1995). Self‐concepts, locus of control, and Machiavellianism of ethnically diverse middle school students who are gifted. Roeper Review, 16(3), 192-194.
Zeidner, M., Shani-Zinovich, I., Matthews, G., & Roberts, R.D. (2005). Assessing Emotional Intelligence in Gifted and Non-Gifted High School Students: Outcomes Depend on the Measure. Intelligence, 33(4), 369-391.
Zeidner, M., & Shani-Zinovich, I. (2011).Do academically gifted and nongifted students differ on the Big-Five and adaptive status? Some recent data and conclusions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 566–570.