Deconstructive analysis of direct instruction components from the perspective of the learning in the flipped classroom..

Abstract
Transforming the educational environment into a learning environment through combining education with new technologies and changing the role of educational components has been considered by educational thinkers. For this reason, the purpose of this article is to identify the poles of conflict in direct education and to provide strategies for empowering the disadvantaged poles. To achieve this goal, the six staged deconstruction method was used. The findings showed that there are changes in different dimensions of the direct education approach, including: 1- Changing the role of the teacher from a commanding mode and transferring knowledge to a facilitating mode of learning 2- Changing the role of the student from being passive and neglected in the learning cycle, to the active and responsible element in education 3- Changing the teacher-centered teaching method to a student-centered method such as project-based, exploratory, laboratory. 4. Changing the educational content from the monologue mode of the fixed book to the dialog mode and situations based on using the experiences of students, electronic content produced by both sides of the learning flow (teacher and student), social networks and internet sites 5- Changing the educational and physical environment of the classroom from its traditional state to a happy environment with maximum participation of learners in learning process, 5- changing the evaluation from the paper-pencil mode to a combination of different methods such as using electronic and self-assessment methods. These changes indicate a change in the perspective in this regard that the necessary trend to change the education and the emergence of the flipped classroom approach has been provided. Using the features of the flipped classroom, we achieve a new concept of learning to meet the needs of the learners of the digital age.
Keywords
Deconstruction
Traditional class
Direct education
Flipped class
Derrida
 Bagheri Noaparast, K & Khosravi, Z. (2011). Deconstructive Religious Education. Religious Education, 106(1), 82-104.
Bergmann,J.&Sams,A.(2014).Flippedlearning:Gatewaytostudent engagement. WashingtonDC: International Society for Technology in Education
Biesta, Gert.j.j (2001) preparing for the incalculable: deconstruction. in. Derrida & Education (Edits) Gert j.j. Biesta, Denise Egea – kuehne. London and new York> Routledge.p.p 32- 11
Biesta, G. & Osberg, D. (2007). Beyond re/presentation: A case for updating the epistemology of schooling. Interchange. 38(1), 15–29
 Biesta, G. J. J. & Miedema, S. (2011). What kind of deconstruction for deconstructive religious education?Response to Noaparast and Khosravi. Religious Edication, 106(1), 105-108.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2012). Giving teaching back to education: Responding to the disappearanceof the teacher. Phenomenology & Practice, 6(2), 35- 49.
Cutrara, S. (2021). Beyond Pandemic Pedagogy: Thoughts on deconstruction, structure, and justice post-pandemic. The Councilor: A Journal of the Social Studies, 82(1), 1
Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. (P. Kamuf, Trans). London: Routledge
. Derrida, J. (1995). The Time is Out of Joint. In Deconstruction is/in America: A New Sense of the Political. (P. Kamuf, Trans). New York: New York University Press.
Derrida, J. (1996) from difference New Historicism an cultural materialism. London: Arnold. New York oxford university press1982
Derrida, J. (2005). Jacques Derrida- Rethinking Architecture, A reader in Cultural Theory. 2 nd ed. London and New York: Taylor & Francis GroupRoutledge.Flipped Learning Network. (2014). The four pillars of F-L-I-P.
 Garrison, J. (2003). Dewey, Derrida, and ‘the Double Bind’. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(3), 394- 399.
 Kuehne, D. E. & Biesta. G. J. J (2001). Opening. In G. J. J. Biesta & D. E. Kuhne (Eds.), Derrida and Education (pp. 114–133). New York: St Edmundsbury Press
L. Rea, Amee. (2015). Student Engagment And Information Recall In Traditional Verses Flipped classrooms. A Thesis For The Degree Of Master, Department Of Humanities And Social Sciences, Northwest Missouri State University
Naas, M. (2021). Education in Theory and Practice: Derrida’s Enseignement Supérieur. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 40(2), 121-133.
Ozmon , S . Craver , M . (2003). Philosophical Foundations Of Education . Newjersy.
Osberg, D. Biesta, G. & Cilliers, P. (2008). From representation to emergence: Complexity’s challenge to the epistemology of Schooling. In M. Mason (Ed.), Complexity theory and the philosophy of education (pp. 204-217). New York: Wiley & Blackwell.
Parra-Gonzalez, M. E. Lopez-Belmonte, J. Segura-Robles, A. & Moreno-Guerrero, A. J. (2021). Gamification and flipped learning and their influence on aspects related to the teachinglearning process. Heliyon, 7: 1-10.
Ruby Yang, Chi Cheung. (2017). An Investication Of Theuse Of The Flipped Classroom Pedagogy In Secondary English Language classrooms. Journal Of Information Technology Education In Novatpnsin Practice, Vol:16, 1-20.
Silverman, H. J. (Ed.). (2004). Derrida and deconstruction. Routledge
Siemens, G. (2008). Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles for educators and designers. ITFORUM for Discussion, 27(1), 1-26.
Slee, Roger & Allan, Julie, 2011, "Excluding the included: A reconsideration of inclusive education", International Studies in Sociology of Education, N 11 (2), p. 173-192.
Trifonas, P. (2000). Jacques Derrida as a Philosopher of Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 32(3), 271-281.