Investigating the views of primary school teachers regarding the role of curriculum requirements in designing philosophy education for children: a case study of primary school teachers in Malayer city.

Authors
1 Malayer University
2 Yasuj University
Abstract
The purpose of the research was to investigate the views of elementary school teachers regarding the role of curriculum requirements in the design of teaching philosophy to children. In order to achieve this goal, descriptive-correlation method was used. The statistical population of the research was elementary school teachers of Malayer city. In order to collect information, a 42-question, 9-dimension salemi questionnaire (2016) was used on a five-point Likert scale. The reliability of this questionnaire was calculated using Cronbach's alpha method of 0.960. In order to analyze the data, Pearson correlation analysis, path analysis and structural equation modeling were used. The research findings showed; There is a positive and significant relationship between the components of the curriculum design requirements for teaching philosophy to children from the teachers' point of view. The results of the path analysis showed that the obtained t values indicate the significance of the path coefficient of all the components in relation to the requirements of curriculum design for teaching philosophy to children.
Keywords

Ab Wahab, M. K., Zulkifli, H., & Abdul Razak, K. (2022). Impact of Philosophy for Children and Its Challenges: A Systematic Review. Children. 9(11):1671. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111671
Kawarazaki, H. (2022). Early childhood education and care: effects after half a century and their mechanisms. J Popul Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-022-00899-w
Kizel, A. (2016). Philosophy with Children as an educational platform for self-determined learning. Cogent Education, 3, 1, https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1244026
Lam, C-M. (2021). The impact of Philosophy for Children on teachers’ professional development. Teacher and Teaching, Theory and Practice, 27, 7, 642-655.
Michalik, K. (2019). Teacher and learner perspectives on philosophical discussion - uncertainty as a challenge and opportunity, Childhood & philosophy, 15, e42675, DOI: 10.12957/childphilo.2019.42675
Oyler, J. (2016). Philosophy with Children: The Lipman-Sharp approach to philosophy for children. In Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory; Peters, M.A., Ed.; Springer: Singapore; 24–31.
Prasetya, D. (2022). Philosophy Education for Children. Journal of Indonesian Philosophy, 3, 3, 109-114.
Välitalo, R. (2017). Internal Goods of Teaching In Philosophy for Children: The Role of The Teacher and The Nature of Teaching In Philosophy for Children. Childhood & philosophy, 13, 27, 271-290. DOI: 10.12957/childphilo.2017.27353
Wu, C. (2021). Training Teachers in China to Use the Philosophy for
Children Approach and Its Impact on Critical Thinking Skills: A Pilot Study.
Educ. Sci. 11, 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050206