Psychometric properties of Scaling of Theory-of-Mind Tasks in Iranian preschool children

Authors
1 Institute for Educational, Psychological and Social Research, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Iran University of Medical Sciences
3 faculty of psychology, Islamic Azad university- Karaj branch
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate some psychometric features of Scaling of Theory-of-Mind Tasks (including adaptation, reliability, factor structure and validity) among Persian-speaking children. It was an adaptation and validation study of a psychological tool which administered in a correlational design. Population were Tehran preschool children and sample included 100 children from 4 to 7 years old in Tehran. Scaling of Theory-of-Mind Tasks and Steerneman ToM test-R were administered. Scaling of Theory-of-Mind Tasks in the Iranian sample has moderate reliability and one factor structure is more representative of seven tasks. Six tasks have the possibility of becoming a general scale and there were significant coefficient between six task and whole score of test, except for scale 1 (different desires). This test can be used well for research purposes as a multiple indicator of the development of the theory of mind. The developmental sequence of the subscales of the test is acceptable for the four subscales (including different beliefs, explicit false belief, content false belief, beliefs about emotions, and knowledge access. However, the age differences were not significant for two kinds of tasks (including different desires and real-apparent emotions). In addition, acceptable convergent validity was observed between the total score of the participants in this test and the score in two subscales of Steerneman ToM test-R. Based on the findings, it can be concluded that the Scaling of Theory-of-Mind Tasks has the necessary features to be used in the field of measuring this component of social cognition in Iranian children
Keywords

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (Eds.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241-251.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Autism and ‘theory of mind’. The applied psychologist, 181-194.
Beaudoin, C., Leblanc, É., Gagner, C., & Beauchamp, M. H. (2020). Systematic review and inventory of theory of mind measures for young children. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1-23.
Bora, E., Vahip, S., Gonul, A. S., Akdeniz, F., Alkan, M., Ogut, M., & Eryavuz, A. (2005). Evidence for theory of mind deficits in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 112(2), 110-116.
Dixson, H. G., Komugabe‐Dixson, A. F., Dixson, B. J., & Low, J. (2018). Scaling theory of mind in a small‐scale society: A case study from Vanuatu. Child Development, 89(6), 1-19.
Doherti M. Theory of mind: How children understand others' thoughts and feelings. New York, NY US: Psychology Press. 2009.
Fu, I. N., Chen, K. L., Liu, M. R., Jiang, D. R., Hsieh, C. L., & Lee, S. C. (2023). A systematic review of measures of theory of mind for children. Developmental Review, 67, 101061.
Ghomrani A, Alborzi S, Khair M. (2006). Realiability and validity of theory of mind test among mental retardation and normal students in Iran. Journal of Psychology. 2006;10(2):181–99. [Persian].
Goetz, P. J. (2003). The effects of bilingualism on theory of mind development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(1), 1-15.
Hiller, R. M., Weber, N., & Young, R. L. (2014). The validity and scalability of the Theory of Mind Scale with toddlers and preschoolers. Psychological assessment, 26(4),1-21.
Korkmaz, B. (2011). Theory of mind and neurodevelopmental disorders of childhood. Pediatric research, 69(8), 101-108.
Muris, P., Steerneman, P., Meesters, C., Merckelbach, H., Horselenberg, R., Van den Hogen, T., et al. (1999). The TOM test: A new instrument for assessing theory of mind in normal children and children with pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 29(1): 67-80.
Peterson, C. C., Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2005). Steps in theory‐of‐mind development for children with deafness or autism. Child development, 76(2), 502-517.
Raghibdoust, S. R., & Malekiyan, M. (2018). Social Cognition Development Pattern of Persian and Persian-Turkish Speaking Preschoolers Based on Theory of Mind Tasks Sequences. Research in Western Iranian Languages and Dialects, 6(23), 61-81 [Persian].
Selcuk, B., Brink, K. A., Ekerim, M., & Wellman, H. M. (2018). Sequence of theory‐of‐mind acquisition in Turkish children from diverse social backgrounds. Infant and Child Development, 27(4), 1-14.
Sundqvist, A., Holmer, E., Koch, F., & Heimann, M. (2018). Developing theory of mind abilities in Swedish preschoolers. Infant and Child Development, 27(4), 747–760.
Shahaeian, A., Peterson, C. C., Slaughter, V., & Wellman, H. M. (2011). Culture and the sequence of steps in theory of mind development. Developmental psychology, 47(5), 1239-1247.
Slaughter, V., & Perez‐Zapata, D. (2014). Cultural variations in the development of mind reading. Child Development Perspectives, 8(4), 237-241.
Steerneman, P. (2012). ToM test-R. Theory of Mind Test Revised: Manual and CD-ROM and testing material Revised. Maastricht. Garant Publishers
Tardif, T., & Wellman, H. M. (2000b). Acquisition of mental state language in Mandarin- and
Cantonese-speaking children. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 25–43
Taumoepeau, M., Sadeghi, S., & Nobilo, A. (2019). Cross-cultural differences in children’s theory of mind in Iran and New Zealand: The role of caregiver mental state talk. Cognitive Development, 51, 32-45.
Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development,
75(2), 523-541
Wellman, H. M., Fang, F., & Peterson, C. C. (2011). Sequential progressions in a theory-of-mind scale: Longitudinal perspectives. Child Development, 83, 780–792.
Wellman, H. M. (2018). Theory of mind: The state of the art. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(6), 728-755.
Yeung, E. K. L., Apperly, I. A., & Devine, R. T. (2024). Measures of individual differences in adult theory of mind: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 157, 1-29.