Evaluation of elementary school teachers based on TPACK model in virtual education

Authors
1 Doctoral student of Curriculum Planning, Kharazmi University
2 Associate Professor, Department of Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Khwarazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Khwarazmi University, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Khwarazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The purpose of the current research was to evaluate primary school teachers based on the TPACK model in virtual education. The quantitative research method was descriptive-survey type. The research population was elementary school teachers of district 13 of Tehran, 253 of whom participated in the research by random sampling method. A questionnaire was used to collect data in the quantitative part. The results showed that the pedagogic knowledge of primary school teachers in virtual education of science courses is almost average. The content knowledge of elementary school teachers in virtual education of science courses is at a favorable level. Knowledge of technology, knowledge of technology pedagogy, knowledge of technology of curriculum content, knowledge of content pedagogy, and technological knowledge of pedagogical and content of elementary school teachers in virtual education of science courses is lower than average. The results of prioritizing the components of the TPACK model also showed that the most important factors are knowledge of curriculum content and knowledge of pedagogy, followed by knowledge of content technology, knowledge of technology pedagogy, knowledge of content pedagogy, technological knowledge of content pedagogy, and knowledge of technology, respectively. have in general, it can be concluded that the situation of elementary school teachers based on TPACK model in virtual education in science course is not suitable and is lower than average.
Keywords

Abbaszadeh, A., Soleimanishakur, S., &Safari, S. (1400). Analysis and review of the challenges and solutions of virtual education and evaluation during the corona epidemic in elementary school. The first international conference of educational sciences, psychology and humanities, https://civilica.com/doc/1218332.
Absari, N., Priyanto, P., & Muslikhin, M. (2020). The Effectiveness of Technology, Pedagogy and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 26(1), 43–51.
Adulyasas, L. (2017). Measuring and factors influencing mathematics teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in three southernmost provinces, Thailand. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(August 2017).
Aktaş, İ., & Özmen, H. (2022). Assessing the performance of Turkish science pre-service teachers in a TPACK-practical course. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3495-3528.
Chai, C. S., & Koh, J. H. L. (2017). Changing teachers’ TPACK and design beliefs through the Scaffolded TPACK Lesson Design Model (STLDM). Learning: research and Practice, 3(2), 114-129.
Ching, G. S., & Roberts, A. (2020). Evaluating the pedagogy of technology integrated teaching and learning: An overview. Int. J. Res. Stud. Educ, 9, 37-50.
Clark, V. L. P., & Creswell, J. W.. Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2011.
Corbin J. & Strauss A. (Eds.). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, 2008.
Creswell J W. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, Thousand oaks’, CA: sage ,2003.
Delamarre, A., Shernoff, E., Buche, C., Frazier, S., Gabbard, J., & Lisetti, C. (2021). The interactive virtual training for teachers (IVT-T) to practice classroom behavior management. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 152, 102646.
Dumpit, D. Z., & Fernandez, C. J. (2017). Analysis of the use of social media in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) using the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-16.
Fauzi, I., & Khusuma, I. H. S. (2020). Teachers’ elementary school in online learning of COVID-19 pandemic conditions. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 58-70.
Haji, J., Mohammadi, M., & eyelashes; M. A. (2022). Representing the problems of virtual education using the happy program during the corona pandemic period: a phenomenological study; Information and Communication Technology Quarterly in Educational Sciences, 11(3), 153-174.
Hamdi, M. (2020). Analyzing the experiences of parents of primary school students of the challenges of virtual education with social networks during the spread of the corona virus. Journal of educational research, 7 (40), 74-101.
Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Action: A Descriptive Study of Secondary Teachers’ Curriculum-Based, Technology-Related Instructional Planning. 43(3), 211–229.
Hoang, N. T. (2015). EFL teachers' perceptions and experiences of blended learning in a Vietnamese university. Professional Doctorate thesis, Queensland University of Technology. Retrieved from http://eprInts.qu t.edu.au/83945/.
Hosseini, A. (2008). Invistigation of the Amount of E-Learning Influence on Learning-Teaching Process & Strategies of Developing it in Arak Department of Education of District 2. Arak: Research Council of Education of Markazi Province; 2008. p. 1-100.
Hosseini, Z. (2015). Comparison of the effect of direct education and structuralism on increasing the integrated knowledge of student teachers' technology. New Approaches to Education, 10(2), 21-40.
Karamati, E., Rahimi, M., & Afra, R. (1401). Identification of challenges and effective evaluation solutions of primary school students' learning in Shaad software by new teachers. Scientific Journal of Education and Evaluation (Quarterly), 14 (56), 69-101.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19.
Konig, J., Jager-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608-622.
Kumala, F. N., Ghufron, A., & Pujiastuti, P. (2022). Elementary School Teachers' TPACK Profile in Science Teaching Based on Demographic Factors. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4).
Kumala, F. N., Ghufron, A., & Pujiastuti, P. (2022). Elementary School Teachers' TPACK Profile in Science Teaching Based on Demographic Factors. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 56-76.
Lai, C., Wang, Q., & Huang, X. (2022). The differential interplay of TPACK, teacher beliefs, school culture and professional development with the nature of in‐service EFL teachers' technology adoption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 1389-1411.
Mailizar, M., Hidayat, M., & Al-Manthari, A. (2021). Examining the impact of mathematics teachers’ TPACK on their acceptance of online professional development. Journal of Digital learning in teacher eDucation, 37(3), 196-212.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Nikunjad, S., & Zamani, B. I. (2013). Comparison of interaction and social presence of virtual and non-virtual students according to demographic factors and academic success. Applied Sociology, 25(3), 119-134.
Ning, Y., Zhou, Y., Wijaya, T. T., & Chen, J. (2022). Teacher Education Interventions on Teacher TPACK: A Meta-Analysis Study. Sustainability, 14(18), 11791.
Oyediran, W. O., Omoare, A. M., Owoyemi, M. A., Adejobi, A. O., & Fasasi, R. B. (2020). Prospects and limitations of e-learning application in private tertiary institutions amidst COVID-19 lockdown in Nigeria. Heliyon,6 (11), 1-8.
Rasmitadila, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic period: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies,7(2),90- 109.
Raygan, A., & Moradkhani, S. (2020). Factors influencing technology integration in an EFL context: investigating EFL teachers’ attitudes, TPACK level, and educational climate. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–22.
Researcher.
Roshni, A., Banehsi, H., Fathivajargah, K., & Khorasani, A. (2017). Challenges of the quality of evaluation of the curriculum of the virtual education course (case study: Shahid Beheshti University). Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 7(18),52-29.
Salimi, S., & Fardin, M. A. (2019). The role of the corona virus in virtual education, with an emphasis on opportunities and challenges. Scientific Quarterly, research in school and virtual learning, 8 (2), 60-49.
Salimi, S., Behari, A., & Modi, B. (1400). Analyzing the lived experiences of elementary school teachers about the strengths and weaknesses of the Shad educational network during the pandemic of Covid-19. New Educational Approaches, 16 (2): 81-98.
Santos, J. M., & Castro, R. D. (2021). Technological Pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100110.
Sariçoban, A., Tosuncuoğlu, İ., & Kirmizi, Ö. (2019). A technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) sssessment of pre-service EFL teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 1122-1138.
Sharifi, M., & Faqihi, A. (2012). Evaluating the e-learning plan in secondary girls' schools of Do Arak district from the point of view of teachers, managers and students and ways to improve it. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Education in Medical Sciences, 4(2), 33-24.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching (pp. 4-14). Educational
Sojanah, J., Suwatno, S., Kodri, K., & Machmud, A. (2021). FACTORS AFFECTING TEACHERS’TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL AND CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (A SURVEY ON ECONOMICS TEACHER KNOWLEDGE). Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 1-16.
Stavroulia, K. E., Christofi, M., Zarraonandia, T., Michael-Grigoriou, D., & Lanitis, A. (2019). Virtual reality environments (VREs) for training and learning. In Learning in a Digital World (pp. 195-211). Springer, Singapore.
Stewart, J., Antonenko, P., Robinson, J. S., & Mwavita, M. (2013). Intrapersonal Factors Affecting Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Agricultural Education Teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(3), 157–170.
Tanrısevdi, M. (2021). Investigating Science Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Competencies: A Mixed Method Study (Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University).
Voithofer, R., Nelson, M. J., Han, G., & Caines, A. (2019). Factors that influence TPACK adoption by teacher educators in the US. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(6), 1427–1453.
Wang, A. Y. (2022). Understanding levels of technology integration: A TPACK scale for EFL teachers to promote 21st-century learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9935-9952.
Wang, W., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Jin, Y. (2018). Preservice teachers' TPACK development: A review of literature. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 234-258.
Wei, X., Chow, M. K., Huang, L., Huang, X., & Cheng, G. (2023). Teacher Evaluation in Primary and Secondary Schools: A Systematic Review of SSCI Journal Publications from 2012 to 2022. Sustainability, 15(9), 7280.
Zareizawarki, I., Ahmadi, R., Nowrozi, D., Delavar, A., &Dartaj, F. (2016). Compilation and validation of the model of educational design of technological qualifications of student teachers based on national and international documents. Curriculum Technology, 2(3), 68-53.
Zare-Khalili, M., & Fereydoni, F. (2019). Pathology of virtual education from the perspective of primary school teachers; A qualitative case study. New developments in educational management, 2 (1), 12-36.