Identifying the dimensions of transformation in humanities with emphasis on the curriculum in the higher education system

Authors
1 azad university
2 Azarbijan Shahid Madani University
Abstract
Introduction:Development in human sciences with emphasis on the curriculum can play an important role in the trend towards this field of study. The purpose of this research was to identifying the dimensions of transformation in humanities with an emphasis on the curriculum in the higher education system.

Methodology: The research method was conventional qualitative content analysis. The statistical sample of the current research is 15 experts in the field of educational sciences in the fields of curriculum planning, management and educational planning, and philosophy of education who were members of the academic staff in the higher education system. and as a result, the findings of the interview reached saturation. The data collection tool at this stage was a semi-structured interview and its model was obtained by analyzing the data in the 6 stages of Clark and Brown.

Results: After conducting the interviews and examining their themes, 16 overarching themes and 44 organizing themes were identified. - flexibility (adaptation to conditions and situations, continuous or continuous thinking), 4- equipment and facilities (physical equipment and knowledge equipment), 5- characteristics of learners (individual characteristics and personality development), 6- characteristics of teachers (management) verbal, core competency); 7- Content characteristics (comprehensiveness, quality and variety), 8- Educational methods and practices (effectiveness, innovation and appropriateness), 9- Educational plans (standards, flexibility and application), 10- Evaluation and control (receive feedback, evaluation, implementation and distribution of information), 11- creativity and innovation (critical thinking, risk-taking and diversification), 12- mission (long-term goals, short-term goals, foresight), 13- active participation, skills soft and motivating), 14- research and research (seminar and conference, interaction between researcher and society), 15- support and support (financial, social, structural, time support) and finally the last theme, i.e. 16- upstream documents (existing laws) , the desired criteria were the national curriculum and moral themes).

Conclusion:The identified components can be used as a framework for creating a common curriculum in the field of creativity and collaboration in higher education, as well as common value creation in educational environments in line with the wave of fundamental changes in humanities curricula in higher education.
Keywords

Amin Khandaghi, M. Jameh Boghor, M. (2012). A reflection on the dimensions of desirable content in teacher education curricula and its examples for the curriculum of Iran's teacher education system. Unpublished master's thesis of the curriculum of Ferdous University of Mashhad.
Altbach, P (2014).Comparative Studies in Higher Education in: Postlethwaite; in (ed). The Encyclopedia of comparative Education and National System of Education, pp 6- 7.
Azizi, N. (2009). Examining the Challenges and Inadequacies of University Education, Iranian Journal of Higher Education, "in the field of humanities, a reflection on students' opinions. Iranian Journal of Higher Education, 1(2), 7-32.
Azzopardi, E., & Nash, R. (2013). A critical evaluation of importance-performance analysis. Tourism Management, 35, 222-233.
Barghi I., Maleki H., Abbaspour A., Zare'i E., Seraji F. (2014). Designing and Validation of Favorable Problem-Based Curriculum Pattern in E-Learning Universities A Combinational Study. Educ Strategy Med Sci, 7 (1), 63-68
Barnett, R.; Coate, K. (2019). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead: SRHE/OpenUniversity Press.
Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in Learning and Teaching: The Case for a Whole-Class Approach in Higher Education. Higher Education 79, 1023–1037.
Bridges, D. (2018). The Higher Education curriculum 21 set century, Cambridge.
Elhamian, N., Hajihosinnezhad, Gh., Mosapor, N., Kian, M. (2020). Designing the implementation model of the teacher training curriculum based on the educational documents of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Research in educational systems, 13(46), 145-161.
Jedeskoy, G & Nissen, J (2004). ICT in the classroom: IS doing more important than knowing? Education & information technologies, )9), 1, 1- 40.
Heydari Sh. (2020). Identifying, compiling and validating indicators and rating dimensions of universities and higher education institutions. Educational planning studies, 8(15), 229-251.
Kuh, G. D(2010). Student Success in College: Creating Conditions That Matter. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
Marefvand, Z., Shams GH., Sabagian Z., (2019). Pathology of the learning culture of humanities students. Journal of Education and Learning Studies, 10(1), 131-167.
Mehrmohammadi, M. (2012). Rethinking the teaching-learning process. Publisher: School.
Moore-Cherry, N. (2019). “Pedagogical Partnerships, Identity Building and Self-Authorship in Geography Higher Education.” In Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Geography, edited by H. Walkington, J. Hill, and S. Dyer, 314–328.
Norouzzadeh, Reza et al. (2008). The status of participation of universities in the review of curricula approved by the Supreme Planning Council, Research and Planning Quarterly in Higher Education, 42, 34-43.
Pariad, R., and Maleki B. (2016), the position of third world countries in the publication of world scientific productions (case study: Iran), National Congress of Humanities: Today's Situation, Tomorrow's Prospects, Tehran, Istfand Mah.
Piri, R., Adib, Y. (2010). The optimal model of the curriculum for the pre-primary period. Journal of Educational Sciences, 5, 53-82.
Salimi Kochi, I. (2013) Transformation in the existing humanities and the advantages of processivism.
Research Institute of Human Sciences and Cultural Studies. Cultural Engineering, 76, 145-134.