Explanation of presuppositions of finding meaning in the research community and their criticism based on Richard Rorty's neopragmatism.

Authors
Abstract
Finding meaning from life experiences is one of the main goals of the Philosophy for Children program, which was designed by Matthew Leppiman and is implemented and followed in the research community. In this article, the presuppositions of Lipman's meaning making in the research community are explained and criticized. Criticism of these presuppositions is done based on the approach of Richard Rorty's neopragmatism. Because he is considered one of the important pioneers in the field of criticism of the tradition of western philosophy.. In order to advance this research, we try to answer three questions: 1- What are the presuppositions of finding meaning in the research community? 2 What is Rorty's opinion about these assumptions? 3- Based on the perspective of Rorty's neopragmatism, what are the criticisms on the presuppositions of finding meaning in the research community? ? Due to the criticality of the current research, the method of developmental criticism has been used to criticize the methods of finding meaning in the research community, and the method of content analysis has been used to explain the presuppositions of finding meaning in the research community and also to reveal the foundations of Lipman and Rorty's thought. The findings of the research indicate that Lippmann's dual pragmatist-realist epistemology, his definition of rationality and having a purely instrumental view of language is the point of contrast between his thoughts and Rorty. From Rorty's point of view, the subject of philosophy should be inclined from epistemology to culture, and meaning should be examined as culture. He is of the opinion that language should be considered as an important element, not just as a tool to talk and communicate with others. Therefore, relying on Rorty's thoughts, Lipman's presuppositions of meaning making in the research community need to be fundamentally revised and reconsidered.
Keywords

- Bella Michela. ( 2020). «The Interlacing of Science and Ethics». European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy. journals, openedition.org
- Curren Randall .(2010) .Pragmatist Philosophy of Education, the axford handbook of philosophy of education
- Dell’Utri Massimo, ( 2019). The Realist Wager. Challenging Rorty on His Home groundSeptember .Accepted, 14 January Springer Nature B.V
-Golding C.(2007) Pragmatism, Constructivism&Socratic Objectivity: the pragmatist epistemic aim of philosophy for children .Wellington
- Guignon Chales& Hilly, David, R.(2003). Richard Rorty. Cambridge uiversity press.
- Guignon Chales. (1986) .On Saving Heidegger from Rorty. Philosophy and Phenomenologycal Reserch.Vol.XLVI,NO3
- Hall David L.(1994) .Richard Rorty:Propet and Poet of the New Pragmatism,Albany.State University of New York Perss.
- Lea Cruz Hilton. (2016).Charles Taylor E Richard Rorty .Perigo sepro messasdeuma cltura Secula. Revistaida,n34,JUL/DEZ
- Lipman, Matthew. (2003).Thinking in education. The Harverster Press
-Lipman, Matthew, AnnMargaret, Sharp, Frederick, S.Oscanyan.(1980).philosophy in the Classroom. The Harverster Press
-Rort, R. (1998) .Objectivity Relativism and truth .in Robert.B. Brandom(ed) Cambridge university press
- Rorty, R.(1991).Essays on Heidegger and others. Philisophical Papers.Cambridge university press
- Rorty, R. (1982). conseqences of pragmatism, university of minnesota press. minneapolis
- Rorty, R .(1989).contingency irony and solidarity, combridge: combrigde university press.
- Rorty, R. (1992). The linguistic Turn. Chicago university press
- Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and mirror of Nature. Prinston university press.
- Rorty R. (2005).Truth and Progress.Translation Denise R. Sales, Ed. Manole, São Paulo
-Sharp A.M (1993).The Commiunity of Inquiry:Education for Democracy.
- Short Edmund.(1991). Forms of Curriculum Inquiry .State University of New York Press
- Stéphane Madelrieux. (2019). Richard Rorty Et La Critique Philosophique.Centre Sèvres « Archives de Philosophie »